Chapter 1 — Executive Summary
Top-line dashboard with key metrics across the total fund, manager performance, risk, and ESG.
🚦 Portfolio Health at a Glance
📈 Total Fund Asset Allocation Overview
$396.7B across 7 categoriesChapter 2 — What We Own
Explore asset allocation, portfolio holdings, and manager-level positions across the $396.7B total fund.
⚖️ Asset Allocation vs. Policy Targets
Actual allocation versus Investment Policy Statement targets. Vertical markers show target allocation.
📊 Detailed Allocation Table
| Asset Class | Market Value ($M) | Actual % | Target % | Difference | Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Equity* | 167,957 | 42.33% | 39.00% | +3.33% | ±8% | In Range |
| Fixed Income | 50,028 | 12.61% | 13.00% | -0.39% | ±5% | In Range |
| Real Estate* | 49,180 | 12.40% | 15.00% | -2.60% | ±5% | In Range |
| Private Equity* | 57,130 | 14.40% | 14.00% | +0.40% | ±5% | In Range |
| Risk Mitigating Strategies | 31,277 | 7.88% | 10.00% | -2.12% | ±5% | In Range |
| Inflation Sensitive | 27,675 | 6.98% | 7.00% | -0.02% | ±5% | In Range |
| Cash / Liquidity | 4,465 | 1.13% | 2.00% | -0.87% | 0-5% | In Range |
| Collaborative Strategies* | 6,627 | 1.67% | 0.00% | +1.67% | 0-5% | In Range |
| Strategic Overlay | 2,396 | 0.60% | 0.00% | +0.60% | — | Overlay |
| Total | 396,735 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
* Includes Sustainable Investment & Stewardship Strategies public and private investments totaling $2,899M
🛡️ Operational Risk Oversight by Asset Class
The Investment Operations & Services team maintains operational risk controls, ODD frameworks, and investment business services across all nine asset categories — ensuring regulatory compliance and proactive risk management for both internal and external programs.
ODD for 100+ external managers, trade settlement oversight
LP/GP structure reviews, capital call processing, valuation controls
Property-level operational audits, JV compliance, NAV oversight
Counterparty risk monitoring, collateral management, ISDA compliance
Margin call processing, clearing house integration, position reconciliation
Unified risk register, state/regulatory compliance, Investment Committee reporting
📉 Performance Measurement Framework
The Head of Performance Analytics oversees the measurement and reporting of returns across all asset classes using industry-standard methodologies.
Key Metrics Managed
Public Markets
Private Markets
Sharpe, Info Ratio
Allocation & Selection
Performance Reporting Cadence
- Monthly: Flash performance reports
- Quarterly: Full attribution reports + operational risk summary
- Semi-Annual: Board performance presentations
- Annual: GIPS-compliant composites + ODD annual review cycle
🏆 Private Equity Performance Context
J-Curve Effect Explanation
IRRs in the first 3 years of a partnership's life are relatively meaningless due to the J-curve phenomenon — early investment expenses before capital gains are harvested. This normally translates into negative IRR early, with values following a "J" shape over 10-12 years until final liquidation.
Factors Impacting IRR
📑 Board Performance Reports
Key performance documents produced by the Performance Analytics team:
🛡️ Operational Risk Integration with Performance
Performance measurement is complemented by operational risk oversight — ensuring that external manager operations, trade settlement, and compliance controls are functioning effectively across all asset classes.
All external managers assessed for operational soundness
Settlement monitoring, exception management, reconciliation
State/regulatory adherence monitored in real-time
🔍 Holdings Explorer
Search across CalSTRS portfolio holdings. Data as of 6/30/2025.
📁 Load Custom CSV Data
Upload a CSV file to explore custom holdings data. The first row should contain column headers.
Click to upload CSV or drag and drop
Supports .csv files
Chapter 3 — Performance & Analytics
CalSTRS total fund analytics, manager-level attribution, hit-rate analysis, risk-based performance, and operational risk oversight across investment programs.
Chapter 4 — Risk & Stress
Investment risk framework, operational risk management, currency exposure, and top holdings concentration across the total fund.
⚡ Risk & Attribution Framework
The Performance Analytics team oversees risk analytics, performance attribution, and portfolio restrictions across the $396.7B total fund.
🛡️ Operational Risk & Due Diligence Framework
The Investment Operational Risk program ensures state/regulatory and policy compliance across all investment strategies and structures, covering public and private markets.
🌐 International Currency Exposure
Top currency positions (USD value, in thousands)
📊 Derivative Instruments Overview
Major derivative categories monitored
🏗️ Top Domestic Equity Holdings
Top 25 positions by market value ($ in thousands)
| # | Security | Shares | Market Value ($K) |
|---|
Chapter 5 — Governance & Research
ESG and climate strategy, data governance programs, data sources, and AI-powered research tools.
🌍 Climate & Sustainability Reports
🎯 ESG Integration in Performance Analytics
🛡️ Data Governance & Operational Risk
The Investment Branch maintains robust data governance and operational risk programs — ensuring accurate, timely, and efficient reporting and analysis across all CalSTRS funds while managing operational risk, controls, and due diligence frameworks for diverse investment strategies.
📐 Framework & Controls
- Data management framework design
- Internal control framework
- Consistent integrated view of total fund
- Performance & risk driver consistency
- State/regulatory compliance
🔗 Collaboration & Integration
- Enterprise data governance alignment
- Data warehouse & AI strategy with IDTP
- Global master custodian coordination
- Investment consultant integration
- Cross-division data standards
⚙️ Technology Transformation (20%)
- Technology transformation strategy leadership
- Service level agreements across divisions
- Reduced operational risks via structured ODD
- Improved internal controls & compliance monitoring
- Increased efficiencies and capacity
- Operational due diligence for external managers
📊 Data Coverage Summary
The data governance program covers all portfolio holdings across 9 investment categories:
🔗 Primary Data Sources
- PortfolioInvestment Portfolio Overview
- HoldingsPortfolio Holdings by Investment Type
- CashCash Equivalents
- DebtDebt Securities
- Deriv.Derivative Instruments
- EquitiesDomestic Equities
- FXInternational Currencies
- Int'l Eq.International Equities
- LPLimited Partnerships
- LoansResidential Loans
- Real Est.Real Estate Holdings
- PE Perf.Private Equity Performance
- RE Perf.Real Estate Performance
- DiversityDiversity in Management of Investments
- ClimateNet Zero Pledge Progress
- RiskClimate-Related Financial Risk
- AncillaryAncillary Investment Program
📄 Secondary Data Sources (PDFs)
- BoardInvestment Performance At-A-Glance (Sept 2025)
- Bench.Performance Benchmarks (July 2025)
- Semi-Ann.Semi-Annual Performance Summary (Dec 2024)
- PEPrivate Equity Performance Report (FYE 2025)
- REReal Estate Strategy Report (Q1 2025)
- PE Pres.PE Executive Summary Presentation (March 2025)
Data Files
- PrimaryperformanceDataPrimary.txt
- SecondaryperformanceDataSecondary.txt
Strategy Roadmap
Investment Systems Modernization, Operational Risk & Data Program
🎯 Core Mission
CalSTRS is committed to modernizing its investment systems and data infrastructure to ensure secure, efficient, and transparent management of $396.7 billion in assets entrusted by California's educators. The Investment Systems Modernization Program aims to replace legacy platforms with scalable, cloud-ready architecture that supports real-time analytics, robust compliance, and data-driven decision-making.
"Modernizing our technology and data infrastructure is not merely an IT initiative — it is fundamental to fulfilling our fiduciary duty to California's 1 million+ educators and beneficiaries."
🛡️ Operational Risk & Middle-Office Vision
The Investment Operations & Services team delivers core middle-office operations and investment business services supporting internal and external investment programs across public and private markets. A cornerstone of this program is the establishment and maintenance of operational risk controls, compliance monitoring, and due diligence frameworks for diverse investment strategies and structures — ensuring state/regulatory and policy compliance across the entire $396.7 billion portfolio.
📋 Strategic Objectives
9 key objectives| Objective | Guiding Questions |
|---|---|
| 1. Strengthen Technology Foundation | How do we modernize cloud infrastructure, harden cybersecurity, and automate disaster recovery for 24/7 fund operations? |
| 2. Elevate Data as a Strategic Asset | What governance frameworks and quality standards turn CalSTRS data into a trusted, auditable pipeline for investment decisions? |
| 3. Enable Advanced Analytics & AI | How do we deploy predictive models, NLP-driven research, and AI-assisted portfolio construction while maintaining compliance? |
| 4. Automate Operations & Compliance | Where can straight-through processing, automated reconciliation, and regulatory reporting free analyst capacity? |
| 5. Enhance Stakeholder Transparency | How do we deliver real-time dashboards, self-service reporting, and richer member communications? |
| 6. Attract & Retain Top Talent | What modern tools, training programs, and culture shifts keep CalSTRS competitive for investment and technology talent? |
| 7. Deliver Measurable ROI | How do we quantify cost savings, risk reduction, and performance gains to demonstrate program value to the board and beneficiaries? |
| 8. Strengthen Operational Risk & Due Diligence | How do we establish comprehensive ODD frameworks, proactively identify and mitigate operational risks across all asset classes, and ensure state/regulatory compliance? |
| 9. Modernize Middle-Office Operations | How do we transform core middle-office operations and investment business services to support both internal and external programs across public and private markets? |
⚠️ Challenges & Opportunities
A balanced assessment of domain-specific and cross-cutting modernization challenges facing CalSTRS — each paired with the strategic opportunity it unlocks.
🔍 Detailed Challenge / Opportunity Matrix
15+ areas| Area | Challenge | Opportunity | Motivation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Office Systems | Legacy portfolio management and order management systems limit real-time analytics | Replace with modern, cloud-based platforms integrated with real-time market data | Faster, better-informed investment decisions across $396.7B |
| Operational Systems | Manual trade processing, reconciliation bottlenecks, custodian integration gaps | Automated trade execution, STP confirmation, enhanced exception management | Reduce operational risk and settlement failures |
| Data Management | Fragmented data silos, inconsistent quality, duplicated sources across divisions | Centralized data warehouse/lake with governance policies and quality controls | Single source of truth for investment data |
| Regulatory Compliance | Evolving state and federal regulations, manual compliance tracking | Automated regulatory reporting framework, real-time compliance monitoring | Fiduciary protection for 1M+ beneficiaries |
| Performance Measurement | Limited attribution analysis, delayed performance reporting to the Board | Advanced attribution methodologies integrated with risk and investment data | Actionable performance insights for asset allocation |
| Third-Party Integration | Disparate vendor interfaces, bespoke file formats, limited API adoption | Industry-standard APIs, data mapping standards, secure data exchange | Streamlined external manager and custodian connectivity |
| Talent & Retention | Legacy skills scarcity, competition with private-sector compensation | Modernize tools, upskill teams, create innovative culture to retain talent | Build sustainable internal technical capability |
| Client / Board Reporting | Static reports, manual generation, limited self-service for board members | Automated report generation, interactive dashboards, online access | Faster, richer transparency for fiduciaries and educators |
| Security Vulnerabilities | Aging infrastructure with unpatched components, limited threat detection | Comprehensive cybersecurity program: assessments, patching, advanced detection | Protect member data and fund assets |
| Scalability | Legacy on-premise systems cannot scale with growing data volumes and user loads | Cloud migration, cloud-native applications, elastic infrastructure | Support fund growth and evolving investment strategies |
| Analytics Capabilities | Limited BI tools for investment analytics, strategy backtesting, risk modeling | Modern data warehouse, BI platforms, visualization dashboards | Data-driven decision-making across all asset classes |
| Disaster Recovery | Inadequate backup cadence, untested failover, extended RTO/RPO | Robust DR/BC plans with redundant systems and regular drills | Business continuity for pension operations |
| Member Experience | Outdated portals, limited self-service, poor mobile support | Modern UX, responsive design, mobile-first member portal | Improved educator satisfaction and engagement |
| Operational Risk Management | Fragmented ODD processes, inconsistent risk assessment across asset classes, reactive incident response | Enterprise-wide operational risk framework with proactive identification, structured risk management plans, and automated monitoring | Comprehensive risk oversight across all investment strategies and structures |
| Middle-Office Operations | Manual workflows in trade support, cash management, and corporate actions; gaps in internal/external program service levels | Modernized middle-office with STP, automated reconciliation, and unified business services for all investment programs | Reduced operational losses, faster settlement, improved support across public & private markets |
| External Manager Oversight | Inconsistent ODD standards, delayed manager reviews, limited visibility into sub-advisor operational controls | Standardized ODD checklists, annual review cycles, risk-rated manager scoring, Investment Committee reporting | Proactive risk reduction across 100+ external manager relationships |
🔧 Implementation Approaches
13 action areas| Area | Action Required | Key Steps |
|---|---|---|
| Front Office | Investment System Modernization | Cloud-based platforms • real-time market data integration • enhanced risk & portfolio analytics |
| Operations | Trade Processing Automation | Automated execution & confirmation • clearing house integration • exception management |
| Data | Data Management Platform | Centralized data warehouse • cross-source integration • governance policies |
| Compliance | Regulatory Framework | Impact assessment • system updates/migration • compliance monitoring framework |
| Performance | Enhanced Attribution | Advanced attribution methods • investment & risk data integration • actionable insights |
| Integration | API & Data Standards | Industry-standard APIs • data mapping rules • security & privacy compliance |
| Talent | Modernize & Upskill | Modern tools & tech stack • innovation culture • competitive compensation |
| Reporting | Client Reporting Automation | Automated generation • performance system integration • online board access |
| Security | Cybersecurity Enhancement | Vulnerability assessment • patch management • advanced detection & staff training |
| Scalability | Cloud Migration | Cloud readiness assessment • phased migration plan • cloud-native applications |
| Analytics | Modern Data Analytics | Enterprise data warehouse • BI platforms • visualization dashboards |
| DR / BC | Robust DR/BC Plans | Redundant systems • regular drills • documented failover procedures |
| Member UX | Modern Member Portal | UX research • responsive web design • mobile-first self-service |
| Op Risk | Operational Risk Framework | Enterprise risk register • structured risk plans across asset classes • automated monitoring & escalation |
| ODD | External Manager Due Diligence | Standardized ODD checklists • risk-rated scoring • annual reviews • Investment Committee reporting |
| Middle Office | Operations Modernization | STP trade support • automated reconciliation • corporate actions • cash management automation |
💡 Strategic Solution Pillars
Four interconnected solution areas forming the foundation of CalSTRS' modernization program.
🏗️ Data Architecture Vision
Target-state architecture┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CalSTRS DATA ECOSYSTEM │ ├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ INVESTMENT │ │ OPERATIONAL │ │ EXTERNAL │ │ │ │ SYSTEMS │ │ SYSTEMS │ │ DATA FEEDS │ │ │ │ (PMS, OMS, │ │ (Trading, │ │ (Market, │ │ │ │ Risk) │ │ Accounting) │ │ Benchmark) │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ▼ ▼ ▼ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ DATA INTEGRATION LAYER │ │ │ │ (APIs · ETL · Real-time Streaming) │ │ │ └──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ ENTERPRISE DATA WAREHOUSE │ │ │ │ (Snowflake) │ │ │ │ ┌─────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ │ │ Raw Zone│ │Curated │ │ Analytics │ │ │ │ │ │ (Bronze)│→ │Zone │→ │ Zone (Gold) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │(Silver) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────────┘ │ │ │ └──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ ANALYTICS & │ │ COMPLIANCE │ │ REPORTING & │ │ │ │ AI / ML │ │ & AUDIT │ │ DASHBOARDS │ │ │ │ (Predictive, │ │ (Reg Monitor,│ │ (Board, │ │ │ │ NLP, LLMs) │ │ Alerts) │ │ Self-serve) │ │ │ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │ │ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ DATA GOVERNANCE LAYER │ │ │ │ Stewardship · Quality · Security · Lineage │ │ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
🏛️ Data Governance Framework
Policies, stewardship, qualityCore Pillars
- Data Stewardship: Every dataset has an identified owner, custodian, and quality SLA
- Data Quality: Automated profiling, validation rules, and anomaly detection on ingestion
- Data Security: Role-based access, encryption at rest/transit, audit logging
- Data Lineage: End-to-end traceability from source through transformations to report
- Metadata Management: Business glossary, data catalog, and impact analysis
Governance Bodies
- Data Governance Council: CIO + division heads set policy and resolve escalations
- Data Stewards Committee: Domain experts maintain quality standards per asset class
- Architecture Review Board: Ensures new systems conform to target-state architecture
- Security & Compliance Team: Monitors access patterns, regulatory changes, and breach response
📊 Key Performance Indicators & Maturity Models
Metrics to track CalSTRS modernization progress, data quality, and business alignment.
📈 Data Quality & Operational KPIs
8 metricsOperational Risk & Due Diligence KPIs
🪜 Maturity Models
3 frameworksCapability Maturity Model (CMM)
Initial — Ad hoc, reactive
Managed — Project-specific controls
Defined — Standardized processes
Quantitative — Metrics-driven
Optimizing — Continuous improvement
Data Management Maturity Model (DMMM)
Ad hoc data practices
Some processes, not standardized
Defined & documented
Measured & monitored
Continuously optimized
Business Intelligence Maturity Model
Descriptive Analytics
Diagnostic Analytics
Predictive Analytics
Prescriptive Analytics
Cognitive / AI Analytics
🏆 Technology Transformation Case Studies
Real-world modernization outcomes at large institutional investors — demonstrating the value CalSTRS can unlock.
📌 Case 1 — Global Investment Firm: Digital Transformation & AI Integration
$500K savings · 5 AI apps- Stagnant technology roadmap hindering growth
- Inefficient data processing and high operational costs
- Limited cross-departmental collaboration
- Legacy systems impacting scalability
- Comprehensive top-down / bottom-up analysis approach
- Trackable adoption framework for product definition
- Five full-stack AI applications deployed
- Modern data lake and warehouse architecture
- 30+ member global team across multiple time zones
📌 Case 2 — Public Pension Fund: Infrastructure Modernization
$5M savings · 14% data quality ↑- Fragmented data systems affecting decision-making
- High manual intervention in processes
- Security and compliance concerns
- Team capability gaps
- Enterprise data management framework established
- Snowflake-based architecture implemented
- Consolidated 267 databases and 326 reports
- Comprehensive security framework created
- Training and retention programs developed
📌 Case 3 — Global Investment Firm: Advanced Analytics & AI
$15B growth · 12% innovation- Need for advanced analytics in investment decisions
- Complex data integration requirements
- High vendor costs and dependencies
- Innovation program needed structure
- AI-driven investment analytics platform developed
- Portfolio optimization algorithms implemented
- Automated marketing analytics system created
- Innovation program with 12% pilot conversion rate
- Blockchain deployment and vendor evaluation led
🛡️ Investment Operational Risk Program
A comprehensive framework for managing operational risk, conducting operational due diligence, and ensuring state/regulatory compliance across all CalSTRS investment strategies and structures.
🔍 Operational Risk Framework Architecture
5 pillars┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CalSTRS OPERATIONAL RISK FRAMEWORK │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT │ │ │ │ Investment Committee · Senior Staff · Board Reporting │ │ │ └────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘ │ │ ▼ │ │ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │ RISK │ │ ODD │ │ CONTROLS │ │ MIDDLE │ │ │ │ IDENT. │ │ PROGRAM │ │ & COMP. │ │ OFFICE │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ Proactive│ │ External Mgr │ │ State & │ │ Trade │ │ │ │ scanning │ │ assessments │ │ federal │ │ support, │ │ │ │ across │ │ across all │ │ compliance│ │ recon, │ │ │ │ all asset│ │ asset classes│ │ monitoring│ │ settle- │ │ │ │ classes │ │ & structures │ │ & testing │ │ ment │ │ │ └─────┬────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └─────┬────┘ └────┬─────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ ENTERPRISE RISK REGISTER │ │ │ │ Risk-rated scoring · Trend analysis · Dashboards │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ REPORTING & ESCALATION │ │ │ │ Quarterly IC Reports · Board Updates · Incident Mgmt │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
📋 Operational Due Diligence (ODD) Program
External manager assessment lifecycleEnd-to-end operational due diligence for external managers across all asset classes and structures — supporting both initial onboarding and ongoing monitoring.
- Organizational structure & key personnel review
- Regulatory registrations & compliance history
- Technology infrastructure & cybersecurity posture
- Valuation methodology & NAV controls
- Annual operational risk reviews
- Key person & organizational change tracking
- Regulatory examination & audit follow-up
- Service provider & sub-advisor oversight
- Risk-scored manager profiles
- Issue tracking & remediation timelines
- Investment Committee reporting
- Board-level risk dashboards
⚙️ Middle-Office Operations Target Model
Core investment servicesThe Investment Operations & Services team delivers core middle-office operations and investment business services supporting internal and external investment programs across public and private markets.
Public Markets Operations
- Trade Support: STP confirmation, matching, and exception management
- Settlement: Multi-currency settlement with custodian integration
- Reconciliation: Daily position and cash reconciliation across brokers and custodians
- Corporate Actions: Automated election processing and income collection
- Collateral Management: Margin calls, pledging, and substitution workflows
Private Markets Operations
- Capital Calls: Processing, funding, and tracking across LP commitments
- Distributions: Waterfall calculations, return of capital, and carried interest
- Valuations: NAV review, valuation committee support, and fair value oversight
- Legal Entity Management: SPV structures, co-investments, and fund-of-funds
- Reporting: Quarterly LP reporting, ILPA compliance, and performance attribution
🏛️ Regulatory & Policy Compliance
State & federal frameworksEnsuring all investment operations maintain compliance with applicable state and federal regulations, CalSTRS investment policy, and fiduciary standards.
🪜 Operational Risk Maturity Model
5-stage progressionReactive — Ad hoc incident response, no formal framework
Emerging — Basic ODD checklists, some manager reviews
Defined — Formal ODD program, risk register, compliance monitoring
Integrated — Automated monitoring, risk-rated scoring, IC reporting
Optimized — Predictive risk analytics, continuous improvement, best-in-class
🗺️ Data Program Roadmap
A phased approach aligned to CalSTRS business objectives — from discovery through continuous optimization.
🔍 Phase 1 — Discover: Objectives, Challenges & Opportunities
Assessment & alignmentConduct a comprehensive assessment of current investment systems, data flows, and organizational processes. Identify pain points, redundancies, and opportunities for improvement.
Expected Outcomes
- Clear understanding of current-state systems and processes
- Identification of key pain points and inefficiencies across all divisions
- Alignment of data program goals with CalSTRS business objectives
- Prioritized roadmap for modernization and optimization
- Baseline operational risk assessment across all asset classes and investment structures
- Gap analysis of current ODD processes, controls, and compliance posture
- Inventory of external manager operational risk profiles and review cadences
📐 Phase 2 — Design: Iterative Analysis & Role Alignment
Architecture & governanceDefine target-state architecture, align roles, responsibilities, and objectives to outcomes, and establish governance frameworks.
Expected Outcomes
- Target-state data architecture documented and approved
- Data governance policies, stewardship model, and quality SLAs defined
- Roles and responsibilities mapped to each modernization workstream
- Technology vendor evaluation and selection criteria established
- Operational risk framework designed: enterprise risk register, risk appetite statements, and escalation protocols
- Standardized ODD methodology and checklists for external manager assessments across all asset classes
- Middle-office target operating model defined: STP workflows, reconciliation automation, and service level agreements
- Regulatory compliance monitoring architecture aligned with state and federal requirements
🚀 Phase 3 — Deliver: Implementation & Continuous Assessment
Build, deploy, iterateExecute phased migration, implement new systems, and establish feedback loops for continuous assessment and improvement.
Expected Outcomes
Data & Systems
- Improved data quality and consistency
- Enhanced data security and regulatory compliance
- Modern, scalable, and secure investment systems
- Streamlined data integration and interoperability
- Reduction in data redundancy and inconsistencies
Operations & People
- Streamlined workflows and reduced manual processing
- Increased self-service reporting capabilities
- Enhanced analytics and visualization tools
- Higher adoption rates for new systems
- Empowered employees leveraging data for decisions
Operational Risk & Due Diligence
- Fully operational ODD program with 100% coverage of external managers
- Proactive operational risk identification and structured mitigation plans across all asset classes
- Automated compliance monitoring with real-time state/regulatory alerts
- Quarterly operational risk reporting to the Investment Committee and Senior Investment Staff
- Modernized middle-office with STP trade support, automated reconciliation, and improved settlement rates
- Enterprise risk register with risk-rated scoring, trend analysis, and board-ready dashboards
✅ Roadmap Summary
This strategic roadmap provides a comprehensive, phased approach to modernizing CalSTRS' investment data infrastructure and aligning it with business objectives. By leveraging KPIs, maturity models, and industry best practices, CalSTRS can set the stage for continuous improvement — positioning the fund for operational excellence, advanced analytics, and innovative service delivery to California's educators.
Modernizing Investment Data & Analytics:
Driving Accountability, Delivering Systems for Performance Excellence.
Technology systems and infrastructure I've built enabled billions+ in AUM expansion and millions in revenue growth, $5M+ operational efficiencies, 77% faster model deployment, and platform scaling from 300 to 1,300+ users across Capital Group, BlackRock, Barclays, SWIB, and LendingClub.
Leadership & Organizational Transformation
Built platforms and systems that scaled staff 4× and doubled users at LendingClub, drove millions in cost savings at SWIB via in-house capabilities, led blockchain/AI innovation at Capital Group, and delivered enterprise analytics platforms at BlackRock and Barclays. My leadership approach centers on accountability, transparency, and measurable outcomes.
Performance & Analytics Leadership
Stakeholder Management
Institutional Experience
Key roles across sectors| Institution | Sector | Relevance to CalSTRS |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Group | Investment Management | Data architecture enabled $15B+ asset growth; innovation pipeline from 153 sourced startups with 12% pilot conversion |
| SWIB (State of WI Investment Board) | Public Pension | Enterprise systems enabled $17B trading flow; in-house capabilities drove millions in cost savings |
| LendingClub | Fintech | Platform reliability supporting 22% client retention; scaled staff 4× and doubled users |
| BlackRock | Asset Management | Enterprise analytics platforms supporting portfolio risk management and performance reporting across $10T+ AUM |
| Barclays | Investment Banking | Trading & risk analytics infrastructure, real-time data pipelines for fixed income and equities |
| Capital Group | Blockchain / AI Innovation | Led blockchain/AI consortium initiative; advanced emerging technology adoption across investment management |
Enterprise System Delivery at Scale
Enterprise systems I architected enabled $17B in trading flow at SWIB, supported multi-billion product launches at Capital Group, delivered enterprise analytics at BlackRock and Barclays, and accelerated model delivery by 77% while reducing production defects 20%.
Systems & Platforms Built
Infrastructure Modernization
Cloud infrastructure modernization reduced costs while enabling scale capacity and operational excellence.
Enterprise Impact & Tangible Results
Data architecture and optimization systems I designed enabled $15B+ asset growth at Capital Group, enterprise analytics at BlackRock and Barclays, platform reliability supporting 22% client retention at LendingClub, and an innovation pipeline generating 12% pilot conversion from 153 sourced startups.
Impact by Institution
| Institution | Impact Area | Metric | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Group | Asset Growth | $15B+ | Data architecture enabling rapid AUM expansion |
| Capital Group | Innovation Pipeline | 153 → 12% | Startups sourced with 12% pilot conversion rate |
| SWIB | Trading Flow | $17B | Enterprise systems supporting trading operations |
| SWIB | Cost Savings | $5M+ | In-house capabilities replacing outsourced services |
| LendingClub | Client Retention | 22% | Platform reliability driving retention improvement |
| LendingClub | Platform Scaling | 4× | Staff scaled 300 → 1,300+ users |
| BlackRock | Enterprise Analytics | $10T+ | Analytics platforms supporting portfolio risk & performance across world’s largest asset manager |
| Barclays | Trading Infrastructure | Global | Real-time trading & risk analytics pipelines for fixed income and equities divisions |
Relevance to CalSTRS Investment Data, Analytics & Operations Roles
Direct mapping of demonstrated capabilities to CalSTRS role responsibilities across data analytics and operational risk.
Transformation Methodology: Stabilize → Optimize → Transform
A board-ready plan to deliver immediate impact and long-term transformation. Proven across pension funds, investment managers, and fintechs — this phased approach ensures continuity while driving measurable modernization.
Stabilize
- Audit current data pipelines & systems
- Fix critical data quality issues
- Establish baseline performance metrics
- Assess operational risk & controls landscape
- Document existing processes & gaps
- Quick-win automation opportunities
- Build stakeholder trust & alignment
Optimize
- Implement data governance framework
- Automate performance reporting
- Enhance attribution methodologies
- Integrate risk & performance systems
- Formalize operational due diligence program
- Modernize vendor integrations (APIs)
- Train & upskill analytics team
Transform
- Cloud-native analytics platform
- AI/ML-powered investment insights
- Real-time interactive dashboards
- Advanced scenario & stress testing
- Predictive operational risk analytics
- Self-service analytics for stakeholders
- Continuous improvement culture
Why This Approach Works for CalSTRS
CalSTRS manages $396.7 billion for 1M+ California educators. The stakes demand a transformation approach that delivers immediate reliability while building toward long-term innovation. This phased methodology has been proven across SWIB (public pension), Capital Group (investment management), BlackRock (asset management), Barclays (investment banking), and LendingClub (fintech) — environments with similar scale, complexity, and fiduciary responsibility.
Critically, this approach integrates operational risk management from day one — operational due diligence, controls testing, and compliance monitoring are embedded in each phase rather than bolted on after the fact. The middle-office operations modernization runs in parallel with data and analytics transformation, ensuring that investment business services keep pace with front-office capabilities across all asset classes and structures.
📐 CalSTRS Total Fund Analytics — Recalculated from Primary Holdings Data
Total Fund: $396.7B | Asset Allocation As Of: January 31, 2026 | Holdings As Of: June 30, 2025 | Source: performanceDataPrimary.txt
⚠ All metrics below are derived/calculated from publicly available CalSTRS holdings and allocation data — not from external manager reports.
📊 Asset Allocation: Actual vs Target
| Asset Class | Market Value | Actual % | Target % | Active Wt | Range | In Range? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Equity | $167,957M | 42.33% | 39.00% | +3.33% | ±8% | ✓ |
| Private Equity | $57,130M | 14.40% | 14.00% | +0.40% | ±5% | ✓ |
| Fixed Income | $50,028M | 12.61% | 13.00% | -0.39% | ±5% | ✓ |
| Real Estate | $49,180M | 12.40% | 15.00% | -2.60% | ±5% | ✓ |
| Risk Mitigating Strat. | $31,277M | 7.88% | 10.00% | -2.12% | ±5% | ✓ |
| Inflation Sensitive | $27,675M | 6.98% | 7.00% | -0.02% | ±5% | ✓ |
| Collaborative Strat. | $6,627M | 1.67% | 0.00% | +1.67% | 0–5% | ✓ |
| Cash / Liquidity | $4,465M | 1.13% | 2.00% | -0.87% | 0–5% | ✓ |
| Strategic Overlay | $2,396M | 0.60% | 0.00% | +0.60% | — | — |
Active Allocation Weights (Actual − Target)
🧮 Allocation Risk Decomposition
Largest Allocation Deviations
🏛️ Top 25 Domestic Equity Holdings (As of 6/30/2025)
Public Equity Total: $167,957M | Top 25 = $22,454M (13.37% of Public Equity, 5.66% of Total Fund)
| # | Security | Market Value ($M) | Shares | % of Pub. Eq. | % of Total Fund |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corp | $5,705.3 | 11,470,040 | 3.40% | 1.44% |
| 2 | Meta Platforms Inc | $2,646.1 | 3,585,067 | 1.58% | 0.67% |
| 3 | Broadcom Inc | $1,947.0 | 7,063,351 | 1.16% | 0.49% |
| 4 | Alphabet Inc (Cl A) | $1,682.6 | 9,547,963 | 1.00% | 0.42% |
| 5 | Tesla Inc | $1,443.9 | 4,545,455 | 0.86% | 0.36% |
| 6 | Alphabet Inc (Cl C) | $1,359.6 | 7,664,516 | 0.81% | 0.34% |
| 7 | Costco Wholesale | $703.6 | 710,741 | 0.42% | 0.18% |
| 8 | Procter & Gamble | $608.1 | 3,816,929 | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| 9 | Bank of America | $542.4 | 11,462,495 | 0.32% | 0.14% |
| 10 | Coca-Cola Co | $480.9 | 6,797,510 | 0.29% | 0.12% |
| 11 | Palantir Technologies | $464.1 | 3,404,419 | 0.28% | 0.12% |
| 12 | UnitedHealth Group | $456.0 | 1,461,545 | 0.27% | 0.11% |
| 13 | IBM Corp | $436.3 | 1,480,097 | 0.26% | 0.11% |
| 14 | General Electric | $429.9 | 1,670,044 | 0.26% | 0.11% |
| 15 | Salesforce Inc | $417.4 | 1,530,835 | 0.25% | 0.11% |
| 16 | Wells Fargo & Co | $413.6 | 5,162,521 | 0.25% | 0.10% |
| 17 | Booking Holdings | $372.5 | 64,342 | 0.22% | 0.09% |
| 18 | Intuit Inc | $360.9 | 458,151 | 0.21% | 0.09% |
| 19 | Advanced Micro Devices | $355.5 | 2,505,028 | 0.21% | 0.09% |
| 20 | ServiceNow Inc | $337.6 | 328,408 | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| 21 | Adobe Inc | $318.6 | 823,501 | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| 22 | Qualcomm Inc | $312.6 | 1,962,913 | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| 23 | PepsiCo Inc | $312.4 | 2,365,930 | 0.19% | 0.08% |
| 24 | Intuitive Surgical | $304.7 | 560,780 | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| 25 | Darden Restaurants | $42.4 | 194,593 | 0.03% | 0.01% |
📈 Limited Partnership Strategy Decomposition
RMS Allocation: $31,277M | Key LP strategies by AUM (excl. RE & PE)
| Strategy | AUM ($M) | Count | Avg Size ($M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trend Following | $9,656 | 6 | $1,609 |
| Macro Strategies | $4,215 | 6 | $702 |
| Real Assets / Infra Energy | $2,858 | 3 | $953 |
| Systematic Risk Premia | $2,311 | 3 | $770 |
| Other / Multi-Strategy | $3,459 | 5 | $692 |
🏢 Real Estate Portfolio Concentration
Total RE: $49,180M | Top 10 = $8,579M (17.4%)
| Holding | Value ($M) | % of RE |
|---|---|---|
| CenterCal LLC Core | $1,614.1 | 3.28% |
| Blackstone PP Europe | $1,097.1 | 2.23% |
| Fairfield CHF Core | $992.5 | 2.02% |
| LCOR Project Platform | $911.1 | 1.85% |
| Lion Industrial Trust | $798.8 | 1.62% |
| Fairfield AHF Core | $644.4 | 1.31% |
| 3650 CAL Bridge Lending | $635.4 | 1.29% |
| Pancal Portfolio LLC | $621.7 | 1.26% |
| SIF Sidecar A | $600.7 | 1.22% |
| P FC1 Core | $564.0 | 1.15% |
⚡ Derivative Overlay & Leverage Analysis
Major derivative notional exposures as of 6/30/2025. Derivatives used for hedging, rebalancing, and synthetic exposure.
Interest Rate Futures Breakdown
| Contract | Notional ($M) | % of IR Futures |
|---|---|---|
| US Ultra Bond (CBT) | $1,954.2 | 39.3% |
| US 5-Year Note (CBT) | $1,062.6 | 21.4% |
| US 2-Year Note (CBT) | $919.2 | 18.5% |
| US Long Bond (CBT) | $464.6 | 9.4% |
| US 10-Year Ultra Fut | $429.5 | 8.6% |
| US 10-Year Note (CBT) | $136.2 | 2.7% |
Swap Counterparty Exposure
| Counterparty | Collateral ($M) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Morgan Stanley | $48.5 | 33.9% |
| BNP Paribas | $31.5 | 22.0% |
| State Street Bank | $21.4 | 15.0% |
| Goldman Sachs | $19.9 | 13.9% |
| RBC (Canada) | $11.9 | 8.3% |
| Societe Generale | $9.9 | 6.9% |
💱 FX Position Exposure by Region
Currency overlay positions (USD equivalent, spot + forwards), as of 6/30/2025
| Region / Currency | USD Value ($K) | % of FX Book |
|---|---|---|
| Europe ($111.6M net) | ||
| EUR | $71,864 | 31.3% |
| GBP | $27,139 | 11.8% |
| CHF + Nordics + CEE | $12,557 | 5.5% |
| Asia-Pacific ($96.6M net) | ||
| JPY | $56,557 | 24.6% |
| HKD | $13,776 | 6.0% |
| KRW + AUD + Others | $26,227 | 11.4% |
| Americas ($20.2M net) | ||
| CAD | $12,641 | 5.5% |
| BRL + MXN + Others | $7,521 | 3.3% |
| China (Net $5.4M) | ||
| CNY Onshore | -$235,035 | — |
| CNY Offshore | +$240,468 | — |
| USD Hedge ($-122.1M) | ||
| USD Net | -$122,072 | — |
🌍 Currency Region Allocation
FX overlay positions (positive exposure only, $229M total across 40 currencies)
Key FX Observations
🛡️ Derived Risk Indicators Dashboard
Computed from holdings data — these are structural/positioning risk metrics, not return-based risk measures.
💵 Cash & Liquidity Components
Cash Equivalents breakdown (6/30/2025). Note: Reverse repos are collateralized borrowings.
| Category | Value ($K) | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Deposits & Repos (Positive) | ||
| BNP Paribas Repo | $56,100 | + |
| Surplus Money Investment Fund | $43,608 | + |
| Barclays Capital Repo | $37,400 | + |
| State Street Bank & Trust | $12,903 | + |
| Reverse Repos (Borrowing) | ||
| Goldman Sachs | -$1,649,959 | − |
| Bank of America | -$251,881 | − |
| Citigroup | -$300,000 | − |
📋 Commercial Paper Holdings
Short-term investment grade corporate obligations (6/30/2025)
🏗️ Infrastructure LP Portfolio
Key infrastructure partnerships within LP & Inflation Sensitive allocations (6/30/2025)
| Partner / Fund | Value ($M) |
|---|---|
| IFM Global Infra (US) I A | $565.6 |
| Meridiam Infra N.A. (multiple) | $309.7 |
| Ardian Infrastructure IV–VI | $334.6 |
| ISQ Global Infra Fund III | $209.6 |
| Stonepeak Infra Fund II–IV | $221.5 |
| Partner / Fund | Value ($M) |
|---|---|
| IFM Australia Wholesale | $243.3 |
| Blackrock GEPIF I–III | $193.2 |
| Blackrock GIF 4 | $178.9 |
| Basalt Infra Partners | $169.3 |
| Arevon Energy JV V | $1,161.9 |
📂 Data Sources & Methodology
All analytics on this tab are recalculated from CalSTRS publicly available data in performanceDataPrimary.txt.
🔬 CalSTRS Active Equity — Manager-Level Risk, Attribution & Performance Analytics
Portfolio: CalSTRS Active Small-Cap Equity | Benchmark: MSCI US Small Cap | Period: 6/30/2020 – 12/31/2024 (4 yrs, 7 mos) | Data: Monthly
All data sourced from CalSTRS publicly available investment reports and board disclosures.
📅 Performance by Year
| Year | Portfolio | Benchmark | Excess |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 37.80% | 40.51% | -2.71% |
| 2021 | 37.92% | 19.56% | +18.36% |
| 2022 | -13.18% | -17.17% | +3.99% |
| 2023 | 22.54% | 18.44% | +4.10% |
| 2024 | 11.02% | 12.04% | -1.02% |
Annual Excess Returns
📊 Performance by Period
Inception: 1/31/03 | Ann. Expected Ex. Ret: 2.0% | Ann. Expected T.E.: 4.0%
| Period | Portfolio | B'mark | Excess | T.E. | I.R. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Month | -2.62% | -0.90% | -3.52% | — | -0.17 |
| YTD | 11.62% | 12.04% | -1.02% | 6.19% | -0.17 |
| 1-Year | 12.83% | 13.04% | -1.02% | 6.19% | 0.23 |
| 2-Year | 16.64% | 7.50% | +1.44% | 9.19% | 0.23 |
| 3-Year | 5.70% | 3.20% | +2.50% | 9.14% | 0.27 |
| 5-Year | 12.27% | 9.34% | +2.93% | 9.81% | 0.30 |
| 10-Year | 8.53% | 9.27% | -0.73% | 8.26% | -0.09 |
| Inception | 14.67% | 11.16% | +3.51% | 8.12% | 0.43 |
| Pre-Invest | 13.48% | 10.34% | +3.14% | 7.74% | 0.41 |
| Invest Period | 19.29% | 14.32% | +4.98% | 9.50% | 0.52 |
⚡ Risk-Adjusted Performance Summary
Return Distribution Statistics
| Metric | Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | Excess Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return (Ann.) | 19.29% | 14.32% | +4.98% | 4.35% |
| Std Dev (Ann.) | 24.83% | 20.70% | 4.12% | 9.50% |
| Best Month | +17.35% | +16.63% | 7.81% | 7.81% |
| Worst Month | -14.55% | -9.47% | -5.46% | -5.46% |
| Best 12 Months | +91.61% | +64.47% | — | +19.68% |
| Worst 12 Months | -18.10% | -20.93% | — | -10.18% |
| Skewness | 0.53 | 0.19 | — | — |
| Kurtosis | -0.31 | -0.42 | — | 1.00 |
| Up Capture | 111.79% | 89.87% | — | — |
| Down Capture | -43.16% | -40.64% | — | — |
📉 Total Risk & Beta (12-Month Trend)
As of 12/31/2024 — Predicted volatility and beta from risk model
| Date | Port Vol % | Bench Vol % | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 23.0% | 20.0% | 1.07 |
| Mar 2024 | 22.0% | 19.5% | 1.08 |
| May 2024 | 20.0% | 19.0% | 0.93 |
| Jul 2024 | 19.0% | 19.0% | 1.02 |
| Sep 2024 | 21.0% | 19.5% | 0.99 |
| Nov 2024 | 23.0% | 20.0% | 1.07 |
🎯 Active Risk (12-Month Trend)
Predicted Tracking Error and Active Share
| Date | Pred. TE % | Active Share % |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 7.2% | 98.0% |
| Mar 2024 | 8.0% | 99.0% |
| May 2024 | 7.2% | 98.0% |
| Jul 2024 | 7.5% | 98.5% |
| Sep 2024 | 8.2% | 98.5% |
| Nov 2024 | 7.0% | 98.5% |
📉 Drawdown Analysis & CUSUM
Monitoring Signals
🌪️ Historical Event Performance
| Event | Portfolio | Benchmark | Excess |
|---|---|---|---|
| GFC Rebound (3/09–4/10) | +138.22% | +81.17% | +57.05% |
| Taper Tantrum (6/2013) | -0.13% | -0.84% | +0.71% |
| Bear Stearns (11/07–3/08) | -18.43% | -16.19% | -2.24% |
| Fed Tightening (10–12/18) | -18.78% | -0.84% | -3.01% |
| Sovereign Debt (5–9/11) | -28.54% | -24.40% | -4.14% |
| GFC (6/08–2/09) | -52.91% | -48.55% | -4.36% |
🔬 Risk-Based Performance Attribution (6-Month RBPA)
Benchmark-relative contribution by risk type, 6-month through 12/31/2024 | Total Impact: -0.08%
🏢 Sector RBPA (6-Month)
Benchmark-relative contribution by sector (%)
🏦 Security RBPA (Top/Bottom 5)
Benchmark-relative contribution by security (%)
🏭 Industry RBPA (Top/Bottom 5)
📌 Top Security Active Weights & Risk
| Security | Active Wt% | Risk Contrib% |
|---|---|---|
| Sterling Infrastructure | 6.77% | 20.02% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. | 5.72% | 13.54% |
| Flowserve Corporation | 4.63% | — |
| Interface, Inc. | 4.18% | 5.65% |
| Frontdoor, Inc. | 4.08% | — |
| SkyWest, Inc. | — | 6.87% |
| Sally Beauty Holdings | — | 6.04% |
📊 Sector Tilts & Risk Contribution
| Sector | Active Wt% | Risk Contrib% |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | +25.38% | 60.99% |
| Consumer Discretionary | -12.34% | 25.01% |
| Materials | — | 5.88% |
| Health Care | -12.42% | 3.39% |
| Financials | -17.71% | -4.71% |
| Information Technology | -10.67% | — |
🧮 Factor Risk (Top 10 Contributions)
| Factor | Active Exp | Risk % | σ-Event |
|---|---|---|---|
| Momentum | 0.48 | 11.55% | 3.21 |
| Earnings Yield | 0.41 | 6.04% | 3.40 |
| US Machinery | 10.77% | 4.57% | 3.23 |
| US Building Prod & Constr. | 6.07% | 3.07% | 3.36 |
| Leverage | 0.55 | 2.53% | 6.27 |
| Investment Quality | 0.57 | 2.36% | 5.27 |
| US Biotechnology | -4.73% | 2.07% | 5.62 |
| US Regional Banks | -7.20% | 1.99% | 8.96 |
| US Consumer Services | 6.22% | 1.64% | 5.04 |
| US Consumer Durables | 4.17% | 1.44% | 5.54 |
💎 Style Factor Impacts (6-mo RBPA)
| Style Factor | Avg Active Exp | Impact % |
|---|---|---|
| Top 5 | ||
| Momentum | 0.69 | +3.65% |
| Book-to-Price | -0.18 | +0.45% |
| Long-Term Reversal | -0.21 | +0.35% |
| Earnings Quality | 0.48 | +0.17% |
| Size | -0.16 | +0.15% |
| Bottom 5 | ||
| Earnings Yield | 0.43 | -1.16% |
| Profitability | 0.43 | -0.50% |
| Growth | -0.13 | -0.18% |
| Dividend Yield | -0.34 | -0.08% |
| Investment Quality | 0.52 | -0.05% |
🏭 Industry Factor Impacts (6-mo RBPA)
| Industry | Avg Active Exp | Impact % |
|---|---|---|
| Top 5 | ||
| US Biotechnology | -5.00% | +1.57% |
| US Airlines | 1.20% | +0.69% |
| US Semiconductor Equip. | -0.75% | +0.40% |
| US Energy Equip & Svcs | -0.90% | +0.30% |
| US Semiconductors | -1.73% | +0.27% |
| Bottom 5 | ||
| US Consumer Durables | 15.26% | -1.76% |
| US Regional Banks | -7.03% | -1.07% |
| US Capital Markets | -4.32% | -0.66% |
| US IT Services & Software | -6.14% | -0.50% |
| US Diversified Financials | -1.58% | -0.40% |
🏗️ Industry Tilts & Risk (Top 5 Active Weights)
| Industry | Active Wt% | Risk Contrib% |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial Svcs & Supplies | +10.78% | 15.33% |
| Construction & Engineering | +5.90% | 19.57% |
| Trading Companies & Distrib. | +5.54% | 13.03% |
| Specialty Retail | — | 7.05% |
| Hotels Restaurants & Leisure | — | 7.01% |
| Largest Underweights | ||
| Banks | -7.69% | — |
| Software | -6.06% | — |
🌡️ Extreme Event Sensitivity
Estimated active impact under historical stress scenarios (current exposure)
🌍 Macro Sensitivity Analysis
Estimated active impact (%) given annualized -2σ shock to macro variables, as of 12/31/2024
Equity Shocks
Commodity Shocks
Credit & FX Shocks
🎯 Hit Rate Analysis — US Market Environments
| Condition | Avg Ex Ret (bps) | Hit Rate | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 43.7 | 61.8% | 34/55 |
| Benchmark Up | 99.2 | 67.7% | 21/31 |
| Benchmark Down | -28.1 | 54.2% | 13/24 |
| Value vs Growth | |||
| Value | 182.9 | 80.0% | 16/20 |
| Neutral | -48.4 | 50.0% | 5/10 |
| Growth | -30.9 | 52.0% | 13/25 |
| Small Value vs Small Growth | |||
| Small Value | 179.5 | 83.3% | 15/18 |
| Neutral | 10.2 | 56.5% | 13/23 |
| Small Growth | -76.1 | 42.9% | 6/14 |
| Large vs Small | |||
| Large | -5.9 | 60.9% | 14/23 |
| Neutral | 38.4 | 60.0% | 9/15 |
| Small | 115.4 | 64.7% | 11/17 |
📈 Hit Rate — Cross-Asset Environments
| Condition | Avg Ex Ret (bps) | Hit Rate | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core vs High Yield | |||
| Core | -55.1 | 50.0% | 2/4 |
| Neutral | 25.5 | 65.6% | 21/32 |
| High Yield | 95.1 | 57.9% | 11/19 |
| US Bond vs Intl Bond | |||
| US Bond | -33.8 | 60.0% | 9/15 |
| Neutral | 54.5 | 65.5% | 19/29 |
| Intl Bond | 120.9 | 54.5% | 6/11 |
| Stocks vs Bonds | |||
| Stocks | 37.6 | 56.7% | 17/30 |
| Neutral | 128.7 | 80.0% | 8/10 |
| Bonds | -0.8 | 60.0% | 9/15 |
| US Stocks vs Intl Stocks | |||
| US Stocks | 28.6 | 58.3% | 14/24 |
| Neutral | -6.1 | 53.3% | 8/15 |
| Intl Stocks | 112.9 | 75.0% | 12/16 |
📊 Alpha Tails: US Environment (bps)
Average excess return in left 20%, middle, and right 20% of market environment distribution
| Environment | Left 20% | Middle | Right 20% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mkt Down | -59.1 | 41.8 | 152.1 |
| Growth | -78.8 | 13.0 | 258.1 |
| Small Growth | -51.4 | -4.4 | 282.9 |
| Small | 165.8 | 42.0 | -73.3 |
| High Yield | 99.2 | 47.9 | -24.5 |
| Bonds | -19.3 | 46.7 | 97.5 |
| Intl Stocks | 132.7 | 28.8 | -0.9 |
📊 Alpha Tails: Barra Factor Environment (bps)
Average excess return in left 20%, middle, and right 20% of factor return distribution
| Factor | Left 20% | Middle | Right 20% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | -121.9 | 18.8 | 284.0 |
| Earnings Yield | -107.7 | 48.1 | 181.7 |
| Dividend Yield | -54.2 | 47.7 | 129.6 |
| Momentum | 102.2 | 66.9 | -84.6 |
| Leverage * | 294.9 | 23.2 | -146.0 |
| Profitability | -28.0 | 13.1 | 207.1 |
| Invest Quality | -18.1 | 38.9 | 119.8 |
| Earnings Quality | 21.6 | 44.1 | 64.4 |
| Earnings Var (-) | 155.5 | 20.4 | 1.6 |
| Beta (-) | 32.1 | 70.8 | -26.3 |
| Residual Vol (-) | -15.3 | 48.5 | 88.2 |
| Size (-) | -10.1 | 57.6 | 55.8 |
* Difference between tail and overall average is statistically significant (two-tailed p-value < 0.05)
📂 Source Documents
All data on this tab sourced from CalSTRS publicly available investment reports and disclosures.
📊 Peer Comparison — Large Public Pension Funds
How CalSTRS compares to peer public pension funds on key performance and allocation metrics.
🏆 Total Fund Returns vs Peers
Annualized net-of-fee returns for FY 2024 across large US public pension plans
| Fund | AUM | 1-Yr | 5-Yr | 10-Yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CalSTRS | $396.7B | 9.8% | 8.3% | 7.9% |
| CalPERS | $502.9B | 11.0% | 7.1% | 7.4% |
| NY State Common | $267.7B | 9.1% | 7.8% | 7.6% |
| FL State Board (SBA) | $254.0B | 10.2% | 8.1% | 8.3% |
| TX Teacher Retirement | $209.6B | 10.5% | 8.4% | 8.1% |
| WA State Investment Board | $184.5B | 8.7% | 8.0% | 7.7% |
Source: Public pension fund annual reports & CAFRs (FY 2024)
⚖️ Asset Allocation Comparison
Policy target allocations across major asset classes (%)
| Asset Class | CalSTRS | CalPERS | Peer Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Equity | 39% | 33% | 36% |
| Fixed Income | 13% | 28% | 22% |
| Private Equity | 14% | 17% | 14% |
| Real Estate | 15% | 13% | 12% |
| Real Assets / Infra | 7% | 2% | 6% |
| Risk Mitigating | 10% | 5% | 8% |
| Cash / Other | 2% | 2% | 2% |
Source: Published investment policy statements
📈 Funded Status Comparison
| Fund | Funded Ratio | Unfunded Liability | Assumed Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CalSTRS | 73.2% | $106.4B | 7.0% |
| CalPERS | 75.1% | $131.3B | 6.8% |
| NY State Common | 95.8% | $11.2B | 5.9% |
| FL SBA | 82.5% | $44.5B | 6.7% |
| TX TRS | 76.4% | $49.3B | 7.25% |
| WA SIB | 79.3% | $38.1B | 7.0% |
💡 CalSTRS Competitive Position
Chapter 7 — AI Performance Analytics Agent
Interactive AI-powered analysis of CalSTRS portfolio data, holdings, risk factors, and investment attribution.